Defense without Government --------------- - government bad at doing things, esp complex things (ex: legal systems) am willing to accept government solution when alternative is worse - court and police aren't complicated enough to require government - define National Defense as invasion defense from a neighbor nation - define Public Good as that where the producer cannot control who gets it (ex: radio broadcast) often economical to privately produce when combined with public bad (ex: advertisement) - can't guarantee that a free market produces it - but must propose a funding model. imperfect, but better than government - founders of the constitution had a good idea with 2nd amendment, mentions militia - prob1: Oliver Cromwell proved that a small professional army beats larger unorganized amateur army - prob2: A large professional army can perform a coup de etat - soln: combine a small professional army with a large unorganized militia - we can take that solution and modernize it - Rudyard Kipling: anarchist poem, story Army of a Dream - piggy-back off national pastime, popular sport that include mock wargames - result: everyone is trained in combat as a side-effect - it's social and voluntary - ex: David himself participates in the Society of Historical Anachronism - modernize: paintball, already proven popular and profitable can be encouraged with nationalistic pride - now we have a large body of amateurs, only need the small cadre of professionals - what about the PR advantage of an Apr 15th parade where Apple, Google, etc. fly drones/jets in shape of logo or do acrobatics - Some stories that David won't write http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Miscellaneous/story_ideas.htm - in battle of govt vs. market, david's trying to find atypical alternatives: cultural, open source - problem with funding the small professional cadre - possible solution: taxicabs have 1$billion non-repeat customers - can encourage cultural factors: war bonds, weapons donation - example: Larry Niven, Oath of Fealty, the private organization that plays the role of government will receive some nationalistic loyalty - example: Cloak of Anarchy (it's actually an anti-anarchy story) - example: The Ungoverned, Vernor Vinge, assumes state is poorer and backwards compared to anarchy Mexico (invader) doesn't think to go around when someone defends Mexico: What slime you are to use nukes against us! Private Security: What do you mean us? He's not a customer of ours! - No current wealthy developed country is worth invading - if rich, no profit in it - if poor, can't afford to - Moral arguments are inadequately convincing - Hume's ought from is problem - don't have to win, the range of differences is not all that much - often can't agree on hypotheticals anyway - ex: Orwell's review of Hayek and Road to Serfdom and Zilliakis The Mirror of the Past he misunderstand market power - David's chosen consequentialism because the economics and reason easier to explain - What about the warlord problem - the accumulated wealth of the richest family (Walton's) could pay for only a couple days of today's government - David would advocate gradual change, to establish alternatives (ex: voucher education) - Anarchy doesn't require uniform culture - donations for common defense can come in many forms: spying, information, reporting, bonds, equipment - Cadre is interacting with the culture - conferences on the latest weapons tech, training classes, etc.. - might be able to use gift economics (ex: open source) - businesses employs basic research scientist as a cultural resource (informant) - status motivation - Mechanism of outrage is not all that good - ex: in South Africa, Americans never upset about Black on Black Nigerian Civil War - Future Imperfect, - we are really rich today, even the undeveloped is 10x more wealthy than historical norm References: - Future Imperfect - Orwell's critique of Road to Serfdom - Cloak of Anarchy - The Ungoverned - Oath of Fealty
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.